# Pastebin tbHJyi9A interest in betting setting odds [2019-07-06 17:59:32] aaaaand what odds do you give that he won't prove that he is satoshi in 2020? [2019-07-06 17:59:50] 100% [2019-07-06 18:00:02] so you'll make a 1:100 bet with me? agreement to bet [2019-07-06 18:00:11] sure [2019-07-06 18:00:15] alright terms being set by Intuit [2019-07-06 18:00:29] I'm convinced if he signs with the very best block reward [2019-07-06 18:00:36] very first* [2019-07-06 18:01:38] a judge saying he is is not convincing restating of terms by Intuit [2019-07-06 18:02:00] if CSW proves he has access to the private keys from the genesis block you pay me 1 BTC and if he doesn't by the end of 2020 i will pay you 0.01 btc disagreement on bet size by Aaaaand [2019-07-06 18:02:27] 0.01 btc isn't worth my time new bet size set by Intuit [2019-07-06 18:02:41] ok ill pay you .1 BTC and you pay me 10 BTC discussion about subject not important to terms/existence of bet [2019-07-06 18:03:32] a judge saying he is is not convincing [2019-07-06 18:03:42] also i suggest you read the documents [2019-07-06 18:03:47] or atleast the excerpts from there [2019-07-06 18:04:04] No time for that [2019-07-06 18:04:04] where the judge says they're convinced he should have access to the public keys that he mined prior to 2010 [2019-07-06 18:04:27] the judge is unconvinced that he doesn't have access because he doesn't have the password and doesn't know the blind trusttee [2019-07-06 18:04:36] or the bonded courier who has the last key slice [2019-07-06 18:05:08] the judge thinks he would have taken steps to ensure he could access the vast amount of wealth acceptance of new bet size by Aaaaand [2019-07-06 18:05:13] but I'll except your bet, if can he prove without any doubt that he has the private keys of genesis block reward before 2021, I'll give you 10 btc, otherwise you give me .1 btc [2019-07-06 18:05:18] accept* Note from Bosma: I consider this bet valid. However, it is not the end of 2020 yet. more discussion about subject not important to terms/existence of bet note, no disagreement about bet existence or terms in the following [2019-07-06 18:05:53] I actually wanted to say: a judge saying he's convinced that CSW is satoshi is not proof for me [2019-07-06 18:06:27] its not proof for me either [2019-07-06 18:06:38] but i think it's better than the marketing campaign against him [2019-07-06 18:06:56] i think there is more evidence saying he does have access than evidence saying he doesn't [2019-07-06 18:07:12] having access doesn't make him satoshi either but hard to deny it at that point [2019-07-06 18:07:17] he would atleast have been very close [2019-07-06 18:07:40] or a thief, but you would win the bet either way [2019-07-06 18:07:49] it would be impressive to say the least [2019-07-06 18:07:50] well the thing is [2019-07-06 18:07:56] even the kleiman estate only wants 50% [2019-07-06 18:08:03] the other 50% they say is his [2019-07-06 18:09:20] but according to emails and interviews from way back in 2015, CSW contacted the kleiman estate to try to ensure they secured dave kleiman's BTC after his death, because apparently they each mined 1 million [2019-07-06 18:09:40] and im guessing they never recovered it or something and now they're trying to sue CSW for half of his [2019-07-06 18:09:52] but the trust documents say it all belongs to craig... [2019-07-06 18:10:17] these emails got leaked by the press back in 2015 [2019-07-06 18:10:33] like almost immediately after he claimed he was satoshi [2019-07-06 18:10:34] between him and kleiman [2019-07-06 18:11:44] lots of correspondence, and even emails from march 2008 from kleiman and wright saying he was going to release whitepaper later that year [2019-07-06 18:12:25] there's huge piles of evidence that he was satoshi and kleiman was his partner if you really look [2019-07-06 18:13:15] why not buy bsv then [2019-07-06 18:13:28] should go up if he can proof that he's satoshi [2019-07-06 18:13:52] because it's PoW [2019-07-06 18:14:17] doesn't matter what it is [2019-07-06 18:14:17] also i don't like craig wright either [2019-07-06 18:14:22] i think him being satoshi is bad for BTC [2019-07-06 18:14:25] he's not a good actor [2019-07-06 18:14:28] it's a guaranteed pump if he can successfully proof it [2019-07-06 18:14:35] lol uhh [2019-07-06 18:14:41] you know he said he wants to crash the price right [2019-07-06 18:14:47] not of bsv [2019-07-06 18:14:47] and he wants to donate it all to chairty [2019-07-06 18:14:55] oh thought u meant BTC [2019-07-06 18:14:56] yeah [2019-07-06 18:14:59] i mean you're probably right [2019-07-06 18:15:06] im not gonna speculate on that tho [2019-07-06 18:15:45] and even if it does go up aaaaand [2019-07-06 18:15:55] i dont think it has the long-term fundamental advantages of tron [2019-07-06 18:16:08] because its proof of work [2019-07-06 18:16:14] which is slow, expensive, and inefficient [2019-07-06 18:16:19] and has no turing complete smart contracts [2019-07-06 18:16:23] you just sell during the pum [2019-07-06 18:16:26] pump* [2019-07-06 18:16:58] sure ... Jasons starts ranting about something 5% fee of winning bet size to find these logs, read them, remove nicknams stupid comments, and analyze bet existence/terms. payable to Bosma (ask for btc address)